Shoot a firework rocket ~ Winners!Make a forum zoo! |
| Welcome to The Round Table. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| H. floresiensis older than previously thought | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Apr 2 2016, 01:34 PM (479 Views) | |
| babehunter1324 | Apr 2 2016, 01:34 PM Post #1 |
![]()
|
Article As the title suggest, a recent study shows that H. floresiensis was considerbaly older than previously thought. The fossil remains had been dated from 100,000 to 60,000 years ago while the stone tools range from 160,000 to 50,000 years ago. Of course this has an important repercusion on the possible causes of extinction of the species and also would make Homo floresiensis no longer the youngest member of the genus Homo after Homo sapiens. Edited by babehunter1324, Apr 2 2016, 02:01 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Extinct Animals & Evolution · Next Topic » |

FAQ
Search
Members
Rules
Staff PM Box
Downloads
Pointies
Groups



