Shoot a firework rocket ~ Winners!Make a forum zoo! |
| Welcome to The Round Table. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| ANOTHER Megaraptoran | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Jul 21 2016, 08:13 PM (1,926 Views) | |
| TheNotFakeDK | Jul 25 2016, 04:10 PM Post #16 |
|
200% Authentic
![]()
|
Because that's not how evolutionary relationships work. Allosauroids (carnosaurs) and coelurosaurs diverged from a common ancestor at least 175 million years ago, and from then on they were two distinct lineages that coexisted with each other from then on. There can't be a "transitional group" because one didn't evolve into the other, they were sister groups, and Megaraptora must belong to either one or the other. |
![]() |
|
| the dark phoenix | Jul 25 2016, 05:28 PM Post #17 |
|
King of wonderlandia
![]()
|
I mean While those two diverged, did the common ancestor just kept going? Living along side its sister groups and retaining the features of both. A third group. |
![]() |
|
| TheNotFakeDK | Jul 25 2016, 05:49 PM Post #18 |
|
200% Authentic
![]()
|
Then they would retain features shared by allosauroids and coelurosaurs from the common ancestor, but that's not what we see. Currently, megaraptorans either come out as derived allosauroids (i.e. neovenatorids), or tyrannosauroid coelurosaurs, meaning they have derived features of each group which would not be found in the common ancestor. If they did represent a distinct group, they'd have to convergently acquire features of both derived groups (allosauroids and tyrannosauroids), and I think it's fair to say that that is far less likely than them belonging to one of these groups and converged upon the other. They only way to explain the derived traits coming from a shared ancestry were if tyrannosauroids were actually closer to allosauroids this whole time (which has a mountain of evidence against it) or if tyrannosauroids and neovenatorids somehow managed to hybridise and form an entire clade out of said hybridisation, which I think we can all agree is pretty unlikely. |
![]() |
|
| heliosphoros | Jul 25 2016, 06:27 PM Post #19 |
![]() ![]()
|
Actually hybridisation as an evolutionary mechanism is starting to be understood to be more relevant than previously thought, even among complex vertebrates like mammals. |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Jul 25 2016, 06:37 PM Post #20 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
Hybridisation between two distinct FAMILIES though? |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | Jul 25 2016, 07:06 PM Post #21 |
![]() ![]()
|
I think that's happened at least with certain bird families before (though it's far from a common occurrence).
Edited by CyborgIguana, Jul 25 2016, 07:06 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| the dark phoenix | Jul 25 2016, 07:26 PM Post #22 |
|
King of wonderlandia
![]()
|
Perhaps tyrannosauroids started going into a allosauroid niche and thus they developed the features? |
![]() |
|
| heliosphoros | Jul 25 2016, 07:29 PM Post #23 |
![]() ![]()
|
Yes. High levels of hibridisation influenced Neornithes and Placental evolution, for example. Hell, it's downright more reasonable than what happened to tunicates... Edited by heliosphoros, Jul 25 2016, 07:30 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | Jul 25 2016, 08:08 PM Post #24 |
![]() ![]()
|
Kind of off-topic but does this mean that theory proposed by that one guy a few years back that humans are actually hybrids between apes and some kind of pig potentially has more credibility than I thought? |
![]() |
|
| Acinonyx Jubatus | Jul 25 2016, 08:31 PM Post #25 |
![]()
I AM THE UNSHRINKWRAPPER!
![]()
|
No. Pigs are NOTHING like humans. It's like saying porpoises are hybrids between dolphins and giraffes. |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | Jul 25 2016, 08:33 PM Post #26 |
![]() ![]()
|
Didn't think so, I was just curious. Question everything and all that. |
![]() |
|
| heliosphoros | Jul 25 2016, 09:57 PM Post #27 |
![]() ![]()
|
It's considerably unlikely since humans are not more closely related to pigs than any other primate. Plus, at least tyrannosaurs and allosaurs look enough like each other to make lust possible. |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Jul 26 2016, 07:25 AM Post #28 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
Given that tyrannosauroids and allosauroids were already very distinct in the mid-Jurassic, and already COMPLETELY different in size and build... I'm surprised the allosauroids in question didn't try to eat the tyrannosauroids. |
![]() |
|
| the dark phoenix | Jul 26 2016, 02:25 PM Post #29 |
|
King of wonderlandia
![]()
|
They probably did snack on them, just not often or they got away. |
![]() |
|
| stargatedalek | Jul 26 2016, 07:54 PM Post #30 |
|
I'm not slow! That's just my moe!
![]()
|
Not perhaps, that's the current consensus. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Extinct Animals & Evolution · Next Topic » |

FAQ
Search
Members
Rules
Staff PM Box
Downloads
Pointies
Groups










