Shoot a firework rocket ~ Winners!Make a forum zoo! |
| Welcome to The Round Table. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Swimming caseids | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 24 2016, 10:26 PM (735 Views) | |
| heliosphoros | Nov 24 2016, 10:26 PM Post #1 |
![]() ![]()
|
http://phys.org/news/2016-11-diaphragm-older.html |
![]() |
|
| BossMan, Jake | Nov 24 2016, 11:44 PM Post #2 |
|
Son of God
![]()
|
Well this is really surprising actually |
![]() |
|
| the dark phoenix | Nov 25 2016, 01:12 PM Post #3 |
|
King of wonderlandia
![]()
|
Well they did always look like fat iguanas to me...didn't know MARINE iguana would be a better comparison. |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Nov 25 2016, 02:29 PM Post #4 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
Well that's a plot twist. |
![]() |
|
| babehunter1324 | Nov 25 2016, 06:01 PM Post #5 |
![]()
|
The animal that looked like an iguana-turtle-hippo hybrid and which coexisted with the long known to be amphibious Dimetrodon and Secodontosaurus turned out to be amphibious. Like, yes, it had never been proposed before, but it makes sense. |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Nov 26 2016, 12:54 AM Post #6 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
Neither Dimetrodon nor Secodontosaurus were ever confirmed to be amphibious. Dimetrodon was once briefly inferred to have been amphibious when they found evidence of a bone bed featuring 30 Dimetrodon and 60 Xenacanthus remains all scattered among each other. But analyses of the morphology and molecular structure of its limb bones and vertebrae, and several trackways, all suggest that Dimetrodon was otherwise completely terrestrial with a pretty efficient, semi-upright gait. The only comparison we actually have for such a concentration of land predators and aquatic prey items are bears around a salmon run. Not to mention that coprolites implied that the Dimetrodon present regularly turned on each other. Secodontosaurus was in fact on basically the same boat. Its post-cranial morphology is almost identical to small Dimetrodon. But since it had a narrower snout with less variable teeth, people just assumed it was a fish eating specialist. But contrary to what you'd expect from an amphibian with a piscivorous diet, Secodontosaurus was named for having cutting teeth - not what you want when you're hunting slippery fish and amphibians - and they actually had forward facing mandibular teeth (like what you see in noasaurids, which apparently specialised in grabbing burrowing animals). |
![]() |
|
|
|
Nov 26 2016, 01:49 AM Post #7 |
![]() ![]()
|
we only have evidence of Dimetrodon predation only on amphibians and sharks last I checked, not on any terrestrial animals in the environment. Also don't entirely see how this is all that surprising considering the build and environment these animals lived in. |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Nov 26 2016, 04:34 AM Post #8 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
I'm curious on what amphibian species we're dealing with here. Because a lot of those were fully terrestrial in the Permian anyway. Diadectes, for example. And what would be the implication for any relationships between Dimetrodon and these giant, swimming caseids? Edited by Incinerox, Nov 26 2016, 04:35 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| babehunter1324 | Nov 26 2016, 06:59 AM Post #9 |
![]()
|
Well I'm pretty sure we have evidence of Dimetrodon predation on Diplocaulus which was mostly aquatic, though it's generally assumed that they were attacked while estivating. Not sure about isotopic evidance but I'm pretty sure we do have direct evidance of Dimetrodon eating Xenacanthus. Also the fact that early Dimetrodon had non serrated teeth and lived in an envioriment with very few land vertebrates may further indicate that the smaller early species obtained a good ammount of their food from aquatic animals. If memory serves me right Dimetrodon angelensis was found from material from the San Angelo Formation making it not just one of the largest but also one of the last Dimetrodons. In case you're wondering the San Angelo Formation macrofauna was dominated by Caseids including possible the largest known species Cotylorhynchus hancocki . I'm not saying late Dimetrodons fed on small to medium sized Caseids... But they almost certainly did. Edited by babehunter1324, Nov 26 2016, 07:17 AM.
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Nov 26 2016, 11:24 AM Post #10 |
![]() ![]()
|
my apologies, the "not surprising" was supposed to be a separate remark about the Caseids since some people seemed surprised they were amphibious. |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Nov 27 2016, 09:58 AM Post #11 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
Honestly, I am one of those surprised people. |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Extinct Animals & Evolution · Next Topic » |

FAQ
Search
Members
Rules
Staff PM Box
Downloads
Pointies
Groups








