Shoot a firework rocket ~ Winners!Make a forum zoo! |
| Welcome to The Round Table. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| What annoys you about paleontology?; Rant on about moronic theories, complaints, or just animals that annoy you. | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Sep 28 2013, 05:04 PM (256,155 Views) | |
| Furka | May 17 2016, 03:27 AM Post #5176 |
![]() ![]()
|
Well, Euoplocephalus is quite the big name too. |
![]() |
|
| Ulquiorra | May 17 2016, 05:03 AM Post #5177 |
![]()
|
Also Polacanthus (thanks to WWD) and maybe Kentrosaurus and Nodosaurus.
Edited by Ulquiorra, May 17 2016, 05:03 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Acinonyx Jubatus | May 17 2016, 11:52 AM Post #5178 |
![]()
I AM THE UNSHRINKWRAPPER!
![]()
|
True, but they're not more popular than Anky and Stego. And Scelidosaurus is at least as popular, if not more so, than some of those mentioned (Nodosaurus, I'm looking at you.) |
![]() |
|
| PrimevalBrony | May 17 2016, 02:57 PM Post #5179 |
|
Youtuber. Combat robotics fan
![]()
|
The idea of all-stars in dinosaur palaeontology in general bugs me. Just because a dinosaur isn't Tyrannosaurus, Triceratops, Brachiosaurus or Stegosaurus, DOESN'T MEAN IT'S NOT INTERESTING. My goal in palaeontology is to make the public accept the rarer dinosaurs for what they are and get rid of the "all-star" treatment |
![]() |
|
| Supersaur | May 19 2016, 06:23 AM Post #5180 |
|
Diabloceratops
![]()
|
PrimevalBrony is right the original few are overused whereas dinosaurs like concavanator or even simple rajasaurus are getting no love but are much more odd and cooler in comparision to the oringinals. Just to make sure im not biased towards carnivores diabloceratops,beipasaurus and even.. tenetosaurus |
![]() |
|
| PrimevalBrony | May 19 2016, 10:34 AM Post #5181 |
|
Youtuber. Combat robotics fan
![]()
|
I know. Literally EVERY SINGLE DINOSAUR MOVIE/TELEVISION SHOW/BOOK CAN'T NOT MENTION THE ALL-STARS ABOUT 3 BILLION TIMES |
![]() |
|
| Supersaur | May 19 2016, 11:25 AM Post #5182 |
|
Diabloceratops
![]()
|
I know. Literally EVERY SINGLE DINOSAUR MOVIE/TELEVISION SHOW/BOOK CAN'T NOT MENTION THE ALL-STARS ABOUT 3 BILLION TIMES ^ This right here is the truth I cant reember the last time when something like proceratosaurus or something unknown by the general public is EVER featured and the last time I recall was jurassic worlds dimorphodon. But.. you know it was precieved as a pteranadon. Also the fact that t-rex is the most stupid fictional movie monster and is nothing compared to any carnivores. Also the fact that they are always scaly and and never comfirmed to be a relative to birds. Like why cant my mainraptorians be related to casswory? |
![]() |
|
| heliosphoros | May 19 2016, 11:45 AM Post #5183 |
![]() ![]()
|
I find it ironic that people are going hipster about dinosaurs, then complain when I point out other interesting critters like non-placental mammals. |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | May 19 2016, 12:36 PM Post #5184 |
![]() ![]()
|
Honestly people who only care about like 4 or 5 of the best-known dinosaurs are indeed annoying, but I find "paleo-hipsters" like you two equally (if not more) annoying. There's nothing inherently wrong with the "all-stars", they're just animals like anything else.
Edited by CyborgIguana, May 19 2016, 12:37 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Acinonyx Jubatus | May 19 2016, 12:57 PM Post #5185 |
![]()
I AM THE UNSHRINKWRAPPER!
![]()
|
What's a Tenetosaurus? Google's got nothing. |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | May 19 2016, 01:07 PM Post #5186 |
![]() ![]()
|
I think he means Tenontosaurus. |
![]() |
|
| Acinonyx Jubatus | May 19 2016, 01:23 PM Post #5187 |
![]()
I AM THE UNSHRINKWRAPPER!
![]()
|
Oh. That would make more sense.
|
![]() |
|
| Supersaur | May 19 2016, 03:00 PM Post #5188 |
|
Diabloceratops
![]()
|
Yeah I would say Im kind of a paleohipster but not to a full extent because My favourite dinosaur is allosaurus which if people spent ten minutes of looking up dinosaurs it would be found possibly easily but yeah I would agree that im a paleohipster but I litterally just opened a book and just took the names out of it (well a few of them) But just to get my point I dont have too much hate for the originals (Except for everyone depicting rex/raptor as scaley) Otherwise im fine with them. But back onto topic I was playing the isle and yet I had at least 20 or so people rage at me when I said that quetzocoatlus is not a dinosaur. Also my science teacher thinks cryptoclidus is a dinosaur and allosaurus as a t-rex Edit: Sorry if that came off as rude (I have asbergers and just wanted to defend myself a little as I generqally dont have a problem with them) Edited by Supersaur, May 19 2016, 03:05 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| PrimevalBrony | May 19 2016, 03:06 PM Post #5189 |
|
Youtuber. Combat robotics fan
![]()
|
1) Don't call me a palaeo-hipster please, I just simply hate that 5 dinosaurs take ALL THE LIMELIGHT. Also there's nothing wrong in wanting rarer dinos to take the spotlight 2) There isn't anything wrong with the actual animals, it's that they're in everything and they're the only ones the public care about that bugs me |
![]() |
|
| stargatedalek | May 19 2016, 03:24 PM Post #5190 |
|
I'm not slow! That's just my moe!
![]()
|
While yes, Quetzalcoatlus is not a dinosaur, you really don't need to go around pointing that our to everyone. They are perfectly valid in being annoyed. You know when your browser puts a little red squiggly line under a word right? Well please when it does that just quickly check to make sure you aren't spelling it wrong, it's actively difficult to read your posts and understand what you're trying to say. Please don't use situations such as autism or aspergers as a get out of jail free card. A lot of people have them and it's offensive when people try and use them to justify putting less effort into themselves. Sure there are a lot of people who don't know many different species of dinosaurs, but that's ok. I'd be willing to bet you don't know a lot about different kinds of cars, or species of sport fish, or the names of super models, or about old movies. Everyone has their own interests and it's important to recognize that not everyone's will overlap with your own. If anything it's not the public to blame at all, they simply haven't been exposed because the media is too afraid of not including recognizable species. I find children like you the most annoying thing about paleontology. You find one animal that you've never heard of before and you cling to it arbitrarily so you can lord your "knowledge of rare dinosaurs" over others. You complain constantly about how laymen don't know the names of your selection of dinosaurs that you think are obscure but really aren't even a little bit. I have worked with people who actually know obscure dinosaurs. I have friends who actually know about obscure dinosaurs. You just found a "top ten rarest dinosaurs" article and based your life around it, just like half the kids your age who like dinosaurs. Edited by stargatedalek, May 19 2016, 03:24 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| 3 users reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Extinct Animals & Evolution · Next Topic » |

FAQ
Search
Members
Rules
Staff PM Box
Downloads
Pointies
Groups











