Shoot a firework rocket ~ Winners!Make a forum zoo! |
| Welcome to The Round Table. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| What annoys you about paleontology?; Rant on about moronic theories, complaints, or just animals that annoy you. | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Sep 28 2013, 05:04 PM (256,150 Views) | |
| Supersaur | May 28 2016, 03:34 AM Post #5251 |
|
Diabloceratops
![]()
|
To be honest I have no idea what a Tiyanulong is (except its a feathered hetrodontosaur) Which I gathered from you. I didnt know to be honest Also why are we calling shoebills B.rexes? |
![]() |
|
| TheNotFakeDK | May 28 2016, 03:40 AM Post #5252 |
|
200% Authentic
![]()
|
Their binomial name is Balaeniceps rex, and in the same way we shorten Tyrannosaurus rex to T. rex, it becomes B. rex. |
![]() |
|
| Yi Qi | May 28 2016, 03:42 AM Post #5253 |
![]() ![]()
|
Here for more information: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tianyulong It's an awesome dinosaur that definitely needs more love. Edited by Yi Qi, May 28 2016, 03:43 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Supersaur | May 28 2016, 03:56 AM Post #5254 |
|
Diabloceratops
![]()
|
Thanks both of you for the info! Edit: Thanks for finding my new favourite ornithopod Edited by Supersaur, May 28 2016, 03:58 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| PrimevalBrony | May 28 2016, 08:01 AM Post #5255 |
|
Youtuber. Combat robotics fan
![]()
|
The fact that this site thinks that human evolution was A: almost instantaneous apparently and B: Thinks that learning about our ancestors not being the top of the food chain is new information http://boredomtherapy.com/dinofelis-humans/?llid=wbPP&as=517LQD&shr=9nl0&pas=113 |
![]() |
|
| Supersaur | May 28 2016, 10:14 AM Post #5256 |
|
Diabloceratops
![]()
|
Reading that, they made the point that nowadays dinofelis was the only thing that humans where scared of. Im pretty sure that other creatures around the same time where also predators that terrified humans. Like bears! Also they kind of make it look like teeth at the front that are larger means deadly hunter! Example Tiyanulong (which know Yi Qi has made me fall in love with ) had large teeth used for chewing plants. But this is my opinion and I could be wrong.
|
![]() |
|
| stargatedalek | May 28 2016, 12:34 PM Post #5257 |
|
I'm not slow! That's just my moe!
![]()
|
I'd never heard that about the photic zone being deeper in the interior seaway. I stand corrected. Having seen dolphin fish hunting (in an enclosed area) they become a lot more visible the deeper they go, hence why I assumed a much larger animal would have difficulty using the same method. |
![]() |
|
| Yi Qi | May 28 2016, 01:28 PM Post #5258 |
![]() ![]()
|
Essentially, sunlight reaches about 200-300m deep in the ocean, when your ocean isn't much deeper than 700m that is a lot, heck that is easily more than half of the water column, essentially making the photic zone the largest zone on the seaway. Moving on for that, it annoys me that people view the triassic as uninteresting and boring when so many interesting life forms were appearing then. Edited by Yi Qi, May 28 2016, 05:14 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Furka | May 28 2016, 01:32 PM Post #5259 |
![]() ![]()
|
^ I agree, the Chinle Formation alone has one of the craziest variety in fauna I can remember. |
![]() |
|
| Mathius Tyra | May 28 2016, 01:38 PM Post #5260 |
![]()
Rat snake is love... Rat snake is life
![]()
|
^I guess because it doesn't have many dinosaurs in it and dinosaurs are what make most people get into paleontology anyway. |
![]() |
|
| Yi Qi | May 28 2016, 02:04 PM Post #5261 |
![]() ![]()
|
But Dinosaurs are only a small part of the diverse animal fauna that inhabited the world in the forlorn past, there are manygroups of creatures throughout the history of the earth that were just as fascinating as dinosaurs can get. They just don't get enough attention and this annoys me. |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | May 28 2016, 02:07 PM Post #5262 |
![]() ![]()
|
People who don't realize that our present understanding of dinosaurs is simply the current consensus rather than pure fact and as such think they can bash old reconstructions for being "wrong", despite the fact that our reconstructions are probably partially wrong as well.
Edited by CyborgIguana, May 28 2016, 02:07 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Supersaur | May 28 2016, 02:16 PM Post #5263 |
|
Diabloceratops
![]()
|
CryborgIguana you are actually correct in my opinion. As far as we know meglasaurs could have feathers yet we dont know and what we have know is mostly just a guess. Because we cant see the extinct animals (unless recently extinct then there is a chance) Basically this isnt like biology where we can go and observe the animals all we can do is guess.
|
![]() |
|
| Acinonyx Jubatus | May 28 2016, 04:42 PM Post #5264 |
![]()
I AM THE UNSHRINKWRAPPER!
![]()
|
Heresy. "Triassic" and "Uninteresting" do not belong in the same sentence. Sharovipteryx, Henodus, Drepanosaurus, Tanystropheus, Sinosaurosphargis, Atopodentatus, Cyamodus, Desmatosuchus, Garjainia, Eudimorphodon, Redondasaurus, and Scleromochlus, among others, all disagree with whoever says that (EDIT: And I didn't even MENTION all the Synapsids.) Edited by Acinonyx Jubatus, May 28 2016, 09:13 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | May 28 2016, 05:07 PM Post #5265 |
![]() ![]()
|
Honestly the Triassic is the most fascinating period of the Mesozoic IMO when it comes to bizarre fauna. |
![]() |
|
| 3 users reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Extinct Animals & Evolution · Next Topic » |

FAQ
Search
Members
Rules
Staff PM Box
Downloads
Pointies
Groups













