Shoot a firework rocket ~ Winners!Make a forum zoo! |
| Welcome to The Round Table. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| What annoys you about paleontology?; Rant on about moronic theories, complaints, or just animals that annoy you. | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Sep 28 2013, 05:04 PM (256,144 Views) | |
| heliosphoros | Jun 24 2016, 12:41 PM Post #5341 |
![]() ![]()
|
![]() That this remains unconfirmed. |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Jun 24 2016, 01:17 PM Post #5342 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
YES. I've been trying to figure out what that is for YEARS. |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | Jun 24 2016, 01:38 PM Post #5343 |
![]() ![]()
|
If that's real, then the giant rhamphorhynchoids that pop up in old B-movies from time to time shall be vindicated! |
![]() |
|
| Acinonyx Jubatus | Jun 24 2016, 04:00 PM Post #5344 |
![]()
I AM THE UNSHRINKWRAPPER!
![]()
|
OH MY GOSH NEED DETAILS This is my new favourite prehistoric lifeform of all time if its true. |
![]() |
|
| heliosphoros | Jun 24 2016, 05:57 PM Post #5345 |
![]() ![]()
|
A pterosaur described by Stoyanow all the way back into 1936. Keep in mind that its never been offiially published in a peer paper, just mentioned in a magazine, and wingspan measurements of that magnitude have often revealed smaller animals, like the 10 meter winged "Ornithocheirus" (now known to be a 4-6 meter wingspanned azhdarchoid). Still, it is nonetheless said to be a much larger animal than any other "rhamphorhynchoid". Edited by heliosphoros, Jun 24 2016, 05:57 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Denomon3144 | Jun 25 2016, 10:29 PM Post #5346 |
![]()
Pick a god and pray!
![]()
|
![]() This is the most recently uploaded image on PalaeoFail. Edited by Denomon3144, Jun 25 2016, 10:29 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| BossMan, Jake | Jun 28 2016, 12:48 AM Post #5347 |
|
Son of God
![]()
|
At least they got the date right, some people are still convinced it and Spinosaurus coexisted |
![]() |
|
|
|
Jun 30 2016, 11:37 PM Post #5348 |
![]() ![]()
|
I hate the trope of making animal's keratin horns, spikes, plates, osteoderm covers, etc. brown or grey. It's just not realistic or even in some cases plausible. I HIGHLY DOUBT that Oviraptorids or Stegosaurs, which have these large structures likely covered in keratin that are basically used only for display, are going to have grey or brown crests/plates. |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | Jul 1 2016, 12:37 AM Post #5349 |
![]() ![]()
|
I think it stems from the mistake of using mammals as reference for such structures, since mammalian horns tend to be rather conservative in colour. And of course in some cases it's probably just general laziness/lack of imagination.
Edited by CyborgIguana, Jul 1 2016, 12:40 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Mathius Tyra | Jul 1 2016, 02:53 AM Post #5350 |
![]()
Rat snake is love... Rat snake is life
![]()
|
Cassowary's keratinous casque isn't much colorful either. I think it depend on what animal need some form of camouflage or some degree of display or not. Solitary and elusive animals probably don't need much colorful keratin covering their crest/plate or spike. |
![]() |
|
|
|
Jul 1 2016, 10:25 AM Post #5351 |
![]() ![]()
|
Cassowaries seem to be an exception, not the norm, at least among birds. Just about every bird with a beak used heavily for display (puffins, hornbills, toucans, some finches) have brightly colored beaks. |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | Jul 1 2016, 10:58 AM Post #5352 |
![]() ![]()
|
Plus cassowaries have colourful facial wattles to make up for the casque. |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Jul 1 2016, 04:45 PM Post #5353 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
Not to mention that guineafowl, maleo, and many hornbills also lack colour in their casques too. And the fact that not all birds are using their bills for display. Edited by Incinerox, Jul 1 2016, 04:51 PM.
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Jul 1 2016, 07:14 PM Post #5354 |
![]() ![]()
|
Certainly not, but I feel it's just a silly trope to give every Dinosaur they draw black or brown or grey plates/scutes/horns. Seems a lot of effort to grow massive bony plates on your back and then just have them as solid grey. Like the trope of giving Dromaeosaurs eagle colors.
Edited by Flish, Jul 1 2016, 07:15 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| stargatedalek | Jul 1 2016, 08:01 PM Post #5355 |
|
I'm not slow! That's just my moe!
![]()
|
One also needs to keep in mind some birds (namely guinea fowls and cassowary) use their casques for fighting and not for display. And hornbills are predatory and probably need to be somewhat conservative with their colours because of this. Because birds see a wider range of colours than us what to us looks like complex patterns with simple colours may look very vibrant to other birds. It bothers me when people feather Dilophosaurus but they don't feather any other non-coelurosaur. It's all or nothing if you go substantially more ancestral then Concavenator. |
![]() |
|
| 3 users reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Extinct Animals & Evolution · Next Topic » |

FAQ
Search
Members
Rules
Staff PM Box
Downloads
Pointies
Groups















