Shoot a firework rocket ~ Winners!Make a forum zoo! |
| Welcome to The Round Table. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Extinct Animal Questions | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 26 2013, 10:24 PM (193,390 Views) | |
| Furka | Jun 19 2015, 05:03 PM Post #1561 |
![]() ![]()
|
It was a seasonal floodplain, so it would have looked like a wetland or scrubland at different times of the year. Kinda like the Okavango. |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | Jun 19 2015, 06:47 PM Post #1562 |
![]() ![]()
|
Pterosaurs also have a soft integument covering known as pycnofibres, but in any case Mark Witton's an expert so I don't think there's any reason not to take his word on the matter. |
![]() |
|
| MightyFan217 | Jun 20 2015, 09:13 AM Post #1563 |
![]()
OH YESSS!
![]()
|
Now this one I know is a spoiler for JW.
|
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | Jun 20 2015, 11:17 AM Post #1564 |
![]() ![]()
|
Maybe the smaller ones, though the biggest mosasaurs and pliosaurs would probably be too heavy to do that. Of course, marine reptiles aren't my area of expertise. |
![]() |
|
| Iben | Jun 20 2015, 11:36 AM Post #1565 |
![]()
There'll be no foot-walking! Just air-flying!
![]()
|
I don't really understand your confusion. The Gannet needs specific feathers to do so, but that's because normal feathers aren't fit for such matters. It isn't the same as "you need feathers to do that kind of plunging". |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Jun 20 2015, 11:46 AM Post #1566 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
To be fair, the only reason why orcas CAN do it is that only a select few populations live along coastlines with the right beach conditions to do so. The seal colonies they ambush so happen to thrive on particularly steep beaches with deep water, made even deeper by crags in the rock. More typical beaches are too shallow for orcas to do that - they'd beach themselves long before they make land. Which is the sort of problem a giant mosasaur or pliosaur would face far more frequently. Were there breeding colonies of, say Hesperornis, that so happened to be on a beach steep enough and obstacle free enough for a giant mosasaur to be able to even reach the shoreline? Unlikely. Gannets have no more specialised feathers than any other sea bird, in that they're waterproof. Most of what makes plungediving possible for gannets is the overly robust skull, with their spearlike beaks and reinforced braincase. Stops them from getting a concussion from hitting the water from a 50m drop at 60+mph. But your average-joe pelicans plunge dive. They don't have these special features. I mean, sure, waterproof feathers like everything else. But they don't have the reinforced skull or spear-like beak. But their plunge diving doesn't generate as ridiculous forces, so they don't need it. This is more the sort of plunge diving we'd expect from known marine pterosaurs like Pteranodon. Nyctosaurus's crest was perhaps too fragile to do this at all. Edited by Incinerox, Jun 20 2015, 11:54 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Paleop | Jun 20 2015, 12:00 PM Post #1567 |
|
Paleopterix
![]()
|
were azhdarchids endotherms, exotherms or mesotherms ? |
![]() |
|
| BossAggron | Jun 20 2015, 05:22 PM Post #1568 |
|
Formerly Dilophoraptor
![]()
|
So far all warm blooded vertebrate flyers are warm blooded, so its safe to assume they are too. |
![]() |
|
|
|
Jun 21 2015, 03:21 PM Post #1569 |
![]() ![]()
|
![]() Which one is more accurate? |
![]() |
|
|
|
Jun 21 2015, 03:25 PM Post #1570 |
![]()
|
I'd say Ibrahim's. Mark Witton has even checked it and found Ibrahim's estimates to be correct. |
![]() |
|
| Tyranachu | Jun 22 2015, 02:46 AM Post #1571 |
|
Nerdasaurus
![]()
|
Guys, how plausible is this Balaur reconstruction, particularly the foot?
|
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Jun 22 2015, 06:58 AM Post #1572 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
They just reclassified it away from the dromaeosaurids, so the actual restoration's outdated. The foot though, I'm not sure. The hallux in the fossil seems to be more in line with the 2nd toe rather than the reversed condition seen in modern birds. But since it's reclassification, I've started to wonder if that's an artifact of fossilisation or if it's a legit big, forward facing 1st toe. I still very much hope we're looking at a particularly carnivorous "jeholornis-oid". But we won't know for sure without a skull and teeth. I know there's no scientific evidence for it, but can't a boy dream? ; ; Edited by Incinerox, Jun 22 2015, 07:05 AM.
|
![]() |
|
|
|
Jun 25 2015, 09:02 PM Post #1573 |
![]() ![]()
|
So is it commonly accepted that Spinosaurus had a sail or hump now a days? |
![]() |
|
| DinoBear | Jun 25 2015, 09:48 PM Post #1574 |
![]()
|
I think it has been agreed that it had a "sump". By me. |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Jun 25 2015, 10:20 PM Post #1575 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
It's looking like the lower portions of the spine were covered in heavy back muscles, but then they ascended into a sail. Fleshed out, the cross section of the torso probably looked tear drop shaped more than anything once all the muscles, fat and skin and whatever extra soft tissues were on the back were added in. |
![]() |
|
| 3 users reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Extinct Animals & Evolution · Next Topic » |

FAQ
Search
Members
Rules
Staff PM Box
Downloads
Pointies
Groups
















