Shoot a firework rocket ~ Winners!Make a forum zoo! |
| Welcome to The Round Table. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Extinct Animal Questions | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 26 2013, 10:24 PM (193,326 Views) | |
| SamtheMan | Jan 10 2016, 03:45 PM Post #2521 |
![]()
|
Yep, Quetzalcoatlus and Hatzegopteryx are tied (as far as I know anyway) for the largest pterosaur, not to mention the largest flying animal. |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | Jan 10 2016, 03:47 PM Post #2522 |
![]() ![]()
|
Arambourgiania was also almost their size IIRC. |
![]() |
|
| SamtheMan | Jan 10 2016, 04:02 PM Post #2523 |
![]()
|
You're right, I kinda let that one slip my mind! The estimate I saw said 7 meters but I should've remembered that it was only a lower estimate. It certainly could've been larger than Tropeognathus and close enough to the other two giants to be a solid 3rd place. Its definitely interesting to note that these 3 giants also lived at roughly the same time. While we're on the topic, does anyone know why the second Quetzalcoatlus species (Q. sp) doesn't have a species name yet? Is it just because of a lack of material to make it uncertain or is there some other reason? Edited by SamtheMan, Jan 10 2016, 04:06 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| BossMan, Jake | Jan 10 2016, 04:02 PM Post #2524 |
|
Son of God
![]()
|
Yup those three are all comparable in size of about 33-36 foot wingspans. With tropeoganathus being nearly that size. |
![]() |
|
| Acinonyx Jubatus | Jan 10 2016, 05:19 PM Post #2525 |
![]()
I AM THE UNSHRINKWRAPPER!
![]()
|
Nyctosaurus. Nyctosaurus was like an Albatross turned up to 11. Probably touched the ground only a few times in its life. Other Pteranodontids and Ornithocheirids were probably similar, but not quite so attached to the air. Azhdarchids and Istiodactylids and possibly some "Rhamphorhynchoids" were adapted for soaring flight as well. And probably most other species could stay airborne for long periods too, the only exceptions I know of being Dimorphodon and possibly the Dsungaripterids, which were a lot like modern gamebirds in their flight patterns. |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | Jan 10 2016, 05:29 PM Post #2526 |
![]() ![]()
|
I think it's because we're not even sure it's a different species, as opposed to just a younger specimen of Q. northropi. It might even turn out to be a different genus entirely, we just don't know since all we have to go by for Q. northropi is a single partial wing. Edited by CyborgIguana, Jan 10 2016, 05:29 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Paleop | Jan 10 2016, 06:27 PM Post #2527 |
|
Paleopterix
![]()
|
speaking of hatzegopteryx, a while back wasn't it determined that it had a shorter neck than quetz? any papers on it? thanks, |
![]() |
|
| BossMan, Jake | Jan 10 2016, 09:15 PM Post #2528 |
|
Son of God
![]()
|
I think the difference was in skull shape, with Hatzegopteryx's being slightly shorter and it had a taller/thicker head crest. I do believe it's neck was shorter though. |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | Jan 10 2016, 09:33 PM Post #2529 |
![]() ![]()
|
Hatzegopteryx was also a bit more robustly-built IIRC. |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Jan 10 2016, 10:33 PM Post #2530 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
To start, of the skull, we have only the occiput (where the neck attaches to) and fragment of its palate (basically the part that goes from the right jugal towards the midline of the roof of the mouth). Then we have a partial humerus, and MAYBE a femur, assuming the referred femur is from the same species, and it lacks both ends - it was still quite large. So we have NO idea what the shape of the animal's skull was actually like AT ALL. Only that the bony rods that actually formed the skull frame would have been proportionally more robust (and styrofoam-like in internal structure). Again, we have zero indication on whether Hatzegopteryx was long-necked or short necked. We have both forms in smaller azhdarchids in the area though - Long necked Euazhdarcho with a 3m wingspan, and a short necked, described but unnamed species estimated to have a 4m wingspan. There has so far been no direct connection between Hatzegopteryx and the short necked species at a cladistic level - only references to pterosaur diversity. At this point, all we can say still was that Hatzegopteryx was one of the 3 giant azhdarchids, and thanks to its proportionally more robust pieces than the other two, it was by far and away the heaviest flying animal ever. It may well have had a short neck like its smaller contemporary. But until further studies are done, we have to assume it was a bit more like the other giants it was related to. That all being said, there's several different hypotheses going around all three Hateg azhdarchids - some say there's 3 distinct species, some think Euazhdarcho was a young Hatzegopteryx, and others think there was more relation between Hatzegopteryx and the stocky new kid on the block. So it's likely that someone, somewhere, is going to look into this and figure things out. |
![]() |
|
| stargatedalek | Jan 10 2016, 10:46 PM Post #2531 |
|
I'm not slow! That's just my moe!
![]()
|
Don't forget Guidraco and Ludodactylus, which would have been comparable to amphibious river dolphins. |
![]() |
|
| TheToastinator | Jan 10 2016, 10:59 PM Post #2532 |
![]()
A piece of toast and a terminator.
![]()
|
Did any other marine reptiles live with Mosasaurus hoffmanni in Europe? |
![]() |
|
| BossMan, Jake | Jan 10 2016, 11:13 PM Post #2533 |
|
Son of God
![]()
|
Plesiosaurs is all that comes to mind. Maybe a few short necked varieties but Im gonna need to double check on that. |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Jan 11 2016, 12:33 AM Post #2534 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
Other mosasaurs are most of what I'm seeing, actually. Anyway, here's what I got: Prognathodon Prognathodon Hainosaurus Halisaurus Plioplatecarpus Carinodens Clidastes Tylosaurus indet. 1 Liodon Elasmosauridae indet. 1 Polycotylidae indet. 1 Gigantatypus Pterosauria indet. 1 Noting some of those mosasaur genera contain more than one species found in the area. |
![]() |
|
| Acinonyx Jubatus | Jan 11 2016, 12:58 AM Post #2535 |
![]()
I AM THE UNSHRINKWRAPPER!
![]()
|
Methinks you're thinking of Boreopterus and Zhenyuanopterus. Guidraco and Ludodactylus were odd-looking, but otherwise par-for-the-course Ornithocheirids. Anyway, the Boreopterids were indeed capable of soaring flight, but their adaptations to a freshwater aquatic lifestyle makes me wonder how often they bothered to do any long-distance travelling. |
![]() |
|
| 2 users reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Extinct Animals & Evolution · Next Topic » |

FAQ
Search
Members
Rules
Staff PM Box
Downloads
Pointies
Groups










