Shoot a firework rocket ~ Winners!Make a forum zoo! |
| Welcome to The Round Table. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Extinct Animal Questions | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 26 2013, 10:24 PM (193,258 Views) | |
| Furka | Oct 14 2016, 04:14 PM Post #3541 |
![]() ![]()
|
Kind of a weird question here, but in a chase through snow scenario, which dinosaur had the best body plan to move through faster, a theropod or a herbivore ? |
![]() |
|
| 54godamora | Oct 14 2016, 04:15 PM Post #3542 |
![]() ![]()
|
I'm sorry but I really need help and this is the only place I feel like I can ask prehistory questions. I asked it in the first place because all of the mentioned crocs have thick armor to protect from a venomous bite and are all the same size. and if I do it again, I'll leave the round table forums...for good. |
![]() |
|
| stargatedalek | Oct 14 2016, 04:24 PM Post #3543 |
|
I'm not slow! That's just my moe!
![]()
|
That would depend on how deep the snow is, and to what extent you're hoping to generalize "herbivore" and "theropod". A quadruped is likely going to have an advantage in relatively shallow snow since they are more stable and have greater bulk that they can throw into their steps to clear the snow in part away before their back legs take the step whereas a biped might need to tread more carefully even in ankle deep snow to prevent tripping. Whereas in deep snow a biped may have the advantage of legs situated higher on its body making it easier to lift them out of deep snow to place the next step. Edited by stargatedalek, Oct 14 2016, 04:25 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Oct 14 2016, 05:28 PM Post #3544 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
Well, if we're talking about general efficiency in snow, large ceratopsians seem to be very well adapted for shunting things about (notably, each other). So in the same way bison, woolly rhinos and elephants would have shoveled their way through snow, ceratopsians probably could have done the same. I suppose sauropods simply had size on their side. "Deep snow" having little to no meaning to them. It's problematic once you consider a snowy "chase" scene, because suddenly you need an animal that can move fast in that environment, and truth be told, no dinosaur seems to be built to do that. Quadrupedal dinosaurs were comparatively slow (compared to say, modern deer and bison), and bipeds would have had to deal with balancing themselves on such dodgy terrain. Hope that helps. |
![]() |
|
| Fireplume | Oct 14 2016, 06:07 PM Post #3545 |
![]()
Snok Snok Snerson
![]()
|
One thing I know about snow is that a great deal of animals that live in it have furry/feathery feet, to further prevent themselves from sinking into said snow. I think it's totally plausible for a Dromaeosaurid or Troodontid to have feathery feet to actively run in snow. |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Oct 14 2016, 08:54 PM Post #3546 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
That's a good point actually. Some of the smaller theropods may have been light enough to at least walk ON snow rather than sink 2/3rds of the way into whatever snowdrift got in the way. |
![]() |
|
| heliosphoros | Oct 15 2016, 10:13 AM Post #3547 |
![]() ![]()
|
Polar fossils in general need more attention. |
![]() |
|
| BossAggron | Oct 16 2016, 11:45 AM Post #3548 |
|
Formerly Dilophoraptor
![]()
|
What are some prehistoric organisms with spooky names? |
![]() |
|
| Jules | Oct 16 2016, 12:10 PM Post #3549 |
![]()
Mihi est imperare orbi universo
![]()
|
Scrotum humanum obviously. |
![]() |
|
| Acinonyx Jubatus | Oct 16 2016, 04:45 PM Post #3550 |
![]()
I AM THE UNSHRINKWRAPPER!
![]()
|
Eucritta melanolimnetes, Acheroraptor, Harpymimus, Kerberos, Ragnarok, Beelzebufo, Stygimoloch, Sordes, Yurlunggur, Dracorex, Balaur, Azhdarcho? |
![]() |
|
| Paleodude | Oct 16 2016, 09:11 PM Post #3551 |
|
ex-Krampus
![]()
|
Surprised you didn't mention Lythronax, Diabloceratops, and Gorgosaurus. |
![]() |
|
| stargatedalek | Oct 16 2016, 11:03 PM Post #3552 |
|
I'm not slow! That's just my moe!
![]()
|
Dracorex is only a truly horrifying name when you include its specific name, "hogwartsia", *shudders in utter contempt*. |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Oct 17 2016, 07:09 AM Post #3553 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
Unfortunately, the spookiest name goes to the very modern Vampyroteuthis infernalis. |
![]() |
|
| heliosphoros | Oct 17 2016, 04:17 PM Post #3554 |
![]() ![]()
|
Jugulator |
![]() |
|
| Acinonyx Jubatus | Oct 17 2016, 04:23 PM Post #3555 |
![]()
I AM THE UNSHRINKWRAPPER!
![]()
|
What was the hunting style of Sabertooth Cats like? |
![]() |
|
| 2 users reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous) | |
![]() ZetaBoards gives you all the tools to create a successful discussion community. Learn More · Register Now |
|
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Extinct Animals & Evolution · Next Topic » |

FAQ
Search
Members
Rules
Staff PM Box
Downloads
Pointies
Groups
















