Shoot a firework rocket ~ Winners!Make a forum zoo! |
| Welcome to The Round Table. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Extinct Animal Questions | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 26 2013, 10:24 PM (193,425 Views) | |
| Taurotragus | Jan 28 2015, 10:49 PM Post #1036 |
![]() ![]()
|
I'm not good with maniraptorans so I wouldn't know which ones were faster than others. Ok so troodonts. |
![]() |
|
| Furka | Jan 29 2015, 05:48 AM Post #1037 |
![]() ![]()
|
It's not a matter of scent, the dead fish would have been unedible a short time after. |
![]() |
|
| Paleop | Feb 3 2015, 02:54 PM Post #1038 |
|
Paleopterix
![]()
|
I would like to learn more about edmontosaurus since I'm going to draw the creature for my art topic soon so i have a few questions.... -1.did edmonto have a smooth back or one like brachylophosaurus?(I have seen both in edmontosaurus art) 0.what kind of pattern did edmonto have? (pictures appreciated) 1.would brown be an acceptable color? (kind of a stupid question on my part) 2.is E. regalis the largest aside from E. annectens ? 3.is the crest a crest or a waddle? 4.overall how bulky? 5. what did the toes look like? 6.throat pouch or no throat pouch? 7.what kind of posture may this animal have adopted? 8.do you think one would taste good? (sorry, I'm hungry I also have a few Questions about other extinct animals... 9.would theropods preen ? 10.is it more plausible to draw ceratopsians with spikes or quils? 11.i heard oviraptorids were very intelegent among dinosaurs, would that make them easyer or harder to train? 12.exactly what colors have been found on caudipteryx? 13.are there good youtube series about dinosaurs(aside from dinosaur George and 'your dinosaurs are wrong' (thegeekgroup)I really recommend them by the way good shows.)thanks, in advance Edited by Paleop, Feb 3 2015, 02:56 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Jules | Feb 3 2015, 04:46 PM Post #1039 |
![]()
Mihi est imperare orbi universo
![]()
|
If you're talking about Georga Blasing, that's not a good series
|
![]() |
|
| Paleop | Feb 3 2015, 05:21 PM Post #1040 |
|
Paleopterix
![]()
|
Dinosaur George that's the channel's link , is that the same guy you mentioned? |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | Feb 3 2015, 06:18 PM Post #1041 |
![]() ![]()
|
The guy who hosted Jurassic Fight Club? Yeah, I wouldn't trust that guy AT ALL if I were you. As for your Edmontosaurus-related questions: 0. Impossible to answer, colours are almost never preserved on fossils. 1. Sure, why not? 2. I think they were both about the same size. 3. It's a soft-tissue crest, so closer to a wattle than to the bony crests of lambeosaurines. 4. It would've been pretty bulky (moreso than the skinny-necked reconstructions we tend to see), though we don't know exactly how much. 5. Didn't have them, the front feet of hadrosaurs were just fleshy pads with no visible toes IIRC. 6. Either is fine. 7. Hadrosaurs were likely capable of adopting both quadrupedal and bipedal postures when needed. 8. Sure, if you're a tyrannosaur. ![]() 9. Mummified remains indicate that Edmontosaurus did indeed have a ridge along its back like that of Brachylophosaurus. Edited by CyborgIguana, Feb 3 2015, 06:20 PM.
|
![]() |
|
| Paleop | Feb 3 2015, 06:42 PM Post #1042 |
|
Paleopterix
![]()
|
since edmontosaurus was very bulky could the ridges on its back been submerged n flesh instead of being visible? |
![]() |
|
| Mathius Tyra | Feb 4 2015, 05:08 AM Post #1043 |
![]()
Rat snake is love... Rat snake is life
![]()
|
Nope... Then what's the point of having ridges? ![]() The word bulky doesn't mean that the animal get their meat increase in every spots of body. It usually mean more flesh around belly, neck, limbs, tail.... And I thought E. regalis is bigger than E. annectens? With the regalis grows up to 13 metres long while annectens stays around 10.... Edited by Mathius Tyra, Feb 4 2015, 05:08 AM.
|
![]() |
|
| Furka | Feb 4 2015, 05:12 AM Post #1044 |
![]() ![]()
|
IIRC the difference between the two was about snout shape (flatter and wider in E. annectens) and age of the fossils (regalis lived earlier). |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Feb 4 2015, 06:13 AM Post #1045 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
Ya see, we know a LOT about both Edmontosaurus species. An amazing amount in fact. But the problem lies in the fact that it's had such a complicated taxonomic history. Well, actually, only one species has. E. regalis is only known from Horseshoe Canyon and hasn't really had much in terms of taxonomic clutter. But E. annectens was the Hell Creek species that we all know from WWD as Anatotitan. But it was only long after even that when it, along with the following species list were merged into one species of Edmontosaurus (since everything older was regarded as nomen dubium and everything younger was, well, younger): Trachodon longiceps Anatosaurus longiceps Hadrosaurus longiceps Anatotitan longiceps Claosaurus annectens Anatosaurus annectens Thespesius saskatchewanensis Anatosaurus saskatchewanensis Edmontosaurus saskatchewanensis Anatosaurus copei Anatotitan copei Until that point, the only Edmontosaurus remains from Hell Creek that were known to be Edmontosaurus were all sub-adults which were only 8m long, give or take. Meanwhile, we had LOADS of E. regalis remains spanning across its entire growth series, with some individuals pushing the 12m mark. So obviously, in the public eye and for the longest time among paleontologists, E. regalis was viewed as the significantly larger species. But of course, since the massive merging to form E. annectens, individuals regarded as different species, some of which EXCELLENTLY preserved, but others not so much, have hinted at E. annectens also matching that 12m mark that its older Canadian relatives reached. So really, the latest studies suggest that both were more or less the same size at about 12m. |
![]() |
|
| Paleop | Feb 4 2015, 09:17 AM Post #1046 |
|
Paleopterix
![]()
|
E. regalis is older than E. annectens does that mean E. regalis did not live in the maastrichtian ? also what would be fairly accurate ZT2/AD biomes for the following? 0.Tyrannosaurus rex 1.Triceratops horridus 2.Ankylosaurus magniventris 3.Styracosaurus 4.Alamosaurus (species that lived in the maastrichtian) 5.Edmontosaurus regalis and annectens 6.Pachycephalosaurus Thanks for answering my questions
|
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Feb 4 2015, 09:49 AM Post #1047 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
I believe I posted an answer to a similar question before. Temperate's yer best bet, given Hell Creek was mostly beech forest. Styracosaurus could be the same, but with different foliage composition. Probably leaning more towards tropical. E. regalis could be Temperate, Temperate Rainforest, or even Boreal to some degree. |
![]() |
|
|
|
Feb 4 2015, 08:00 PM Post #1048 |
![]() ![]()
|
Besides Pterorhynchus, do we have any Pterosaur fossils which show patterning? |
![]() |
|
| Incinerox | Feb 4 2015, 08:33 PM Post #1049 |
![]()
Āeksiot Zaldrīzoti
![]()
|
We might have possible fossil melanosomes for some pterosaurs, but nothing as detailed as Pterorhynchus. |
![]() |
|
| Yutyrannus the second | Feb 5 2015, 02:40 PM Post #1050 |
![]() ![]()
|
Wait, we know Pterorhynchus` colors? Which one did it had? |
![]() |
|
| 3 users reading this topic (3 Guests and 0 Anonymous) | |
| Go to Next Page | |
| « Previous Topic · Extinct Animals & Evolution · Next Topic » |

FAQ
Search
Members
Rules
Staff PM Box
Downloads
Pointies
Groups








good shows.)







