| Welcome to The Round Table. We hope you enjoy your visit. You're currently viewing our forum as a guest. This means you are limited to certain areas of the board and there are some features you can't use. If you join our community, you'll be able to access member-only sections, and use many member-only features such as customizing your profile, sending personal messages, and voting in polls. Registration is simple, fast, and completely free. Join our community! If you're already a member please log in to your account to access all of our features: |
| Ecotourism vs hunting | |
|---|---|
| Topic Started: Nov 28 2013, 10:23 AM (3,335 Views) | |
| Furka | Dec 8 2013, 03:56 PM Post #76 |
![]() ![]()
|
and that's how you do waste an animal IMO. again, animals for mounts should come from captive specimens. if zoos don't provide them that's another problem, you should try to do something about that rather than replacing them with wild animals which are more useful when alive. |
![]() |
|
|
|
Dec 8 2013, 04:11 PM Post #77 |
![]()
|
I get what's possible from local zoo, up to the hippo (not whole, too heavy). Btw purchasing a tag for game species to increase museum collection is not wrong at all. And many hunters are known for donating their trophy rooms for the public display. |
![]() |
|
| Hamikins | Dec 9 2013, 01:26 AM Post #78 |
![]()
You will respect my authoratah.
![]()
|
Animals are better alive then dead. And mounting will never be a needed thing we must have. I don't agree with it. |
![]() |
|
| Sheather | Dec 9 2013, 01:36 AM Post #79 |
![]()
Thank you for the set, Azrael!
![]()
|
I'm uncomfortable with any taxidermy. I don't support hunting just to mount something, ever, any species, in any case. I support the recycling of zoo animals into mounts, however, or mounting something you eat. |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | Dec 9 2013, 02:07 AM Post #80 |
![]() ![]()
|
I'm ok with taxidermy for the purpose of museum display, just not for the purpose of trophies. |
![]() |
|
|
|
Dec 9 2013, 10:39 AM Post #81 |
|
Banned for being rude.
![]()
|
Exactly, it doesn't prove anything to have a stuffed carnivore that was killed for fun. |
![]() |
|
| Australman | Dec 9 2013, 10:56 AM Post #82 |
![]() ![]()
|
it was not necessary to display dead animals and being able to see animals alive is better than looking at a lifeless skeleton |
![]() |
|
| CyborgIguana | Dec 9 2013, 11:05 AM Post #83 |
![]() ![]()
|
Still, if we hadn't preserved the specimens of species that went extinct, we'd have no evidence left of the Dodo, Thylacine, or Passenger Pigeon today. |
![]() |
|
| Furka | Dec 9 2013, 11:14 AM Post #84 |
![]() ![]()
|
a lifeless skeleton can provide clues that you would never be able to get from a real animal. you can learn a lot from a dead animal, from how is it able to do some stuff to various pathologies that affects it. |
![]() |
|
|
|
Dec 9 2013, 11:32 AM Post #85 |
![]()
|
And every animal, even a common one, is unique more or less, if those are not lab mice siblings For example, I done several bobcat skulls left over by hunters that wanted just fur & claws. Each of them had different measurements and dentition, and one even had 6 canine teeth!!! |
![]() |
|
| 1 user reading this topic (1 Guest and 0 Anonymous) | |
| « Previous Topic · Pets & Wildlife · Next Topic » |

FAQ
Search
Members
Rules
Staff PM Box
Downloads
Pointies
Groups













